[rules-users] [FUSION] Detect the absence of an event when you don't know that the event is missing.
Tina Vießmann
tviessmann at stud.hs-bremen.de
Fri Oct 22 16:49:05 EDT 2010
Hi,
I'm working on a use case where I want to know if 20 events with a
specific value are contained in at maximum the last 150 events. So far I
know what have to do. ;-)
My problem is that as extension to my condition, the rule shall also
trigger if one ore more events are missing. But I don't know the time
interval with which the events arrive, so that I don't know when a new
event should arrive and by implication I don't know about the absence of
an event.
In our environment events arrive in "counts" and not in a specific time
interval as e.g. ever 1 second. So we talk about the last two or 150
counts if we talk about the last two ore 150 data packages received.
Yes, behind a count always is a time interval, but only the data source
knows about the time interval. My recipient doesn't
Also the data of a data package is inserted in the working memory
independently, so that I have e.g. 10 data events instead of a single
package event.
(Now that you know that, my first sentence would be correctly: I want to
know if 20 counts of the max. last 150 counts have contained a specific
event.)
If my explanation (or my attempt to explain) is difficult to understand,
please ask me what you want to know.
I would be very happy about any ideas.
Thank you.
Tina
More information about the rules-users
mailing list