[rules-users] Is RETE algo optimizes the performance in a stateless session.

[Mark Proctor]

  On 24/09/2010 16:18, Leonardo Gomes wrote:
> Have a look here: http://www.drdobbs.com/184405218
>
> here: http://blog.athico.com/2007/07/sequential-rete.html
>
> and here: http://herzberg.ca.sandia.gov/guidelines.shtml
>
> The easy answer for your question is "Yes" ;-)
It depends :)

In general a stateless session is just a convenience api for stateful, 
it just wraps. So no performance gain at all.

There is a "sequential" mode, but in all honest you won't get any 
measurable perf gain. So I wouldn't use sequential mode for performance, 
the only reason to use it is if you want your rules to execute sequentially.

Mark
>
> Cheers,
> Leo.
>
> 2010/9/24 Harshit Bapna <hrbapna at gmail.com <mailto:hrbapna at gmail.com>>
>
>     Hi All,
>
>     In a scenario where lets say 10 rule are to be fired (in any
>     order) in a stateless session than will I get the benefits of RETE
>     algorithm (i.e increased performance).
>     i.e Whether the engine will fire all the ten results in a parallel
>     fashion or Whether the engine will file each rule one by one.
>
>     How RETE algorithm will improve the performance of the engine for
>     rules fired in stateless session ?
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     rules-users mailing list
>     rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100924/2b5daef9/attachment.html