[rules-users] KnowledgeAgent Issue

[Esteban Aliverti]

I have created the following issue to keep track of this problem:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-2940

I have also made some fixes, so It would be great if you could test them.

Best Regards,

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Esteban Aliverti
- Developer @ http://www.plugtree.com
- Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com


On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Steven Williams <stevearoonie at gmail.com>wrote:

> I'm not sure whether they were added or not. I noticed the rules weren't
> running when I expected them to though, so perhaps not. I have worked around
> it by putting all my rules in the same package - luckily I only had about 30
> different rule files, but it is a less than ideal solution.
>
> Once I have everything working and checked in on my project I'll test
> further to see what is going on.
>
> Steve
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Esteban Aliverti <
> esteban.aliverti at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Someone mentioned me the problem some time ago. I have a fix for it in my
>> local repo, butI was waiting for the trunk to be stable to test it.
>> The problem is that under certain circumstances, the kagent is reusing the
>> same kbuilder to compile all the resources present in a change-set (the
>> modifications I have force the agent to use a new kbuilder for each
>> resource).
>> The only difference between what you are reporting and the problem I'm
>> talking about is that in my case all the rules, functions, etc were added to
>> the kbase, but all within the same package. No matter the real package
>> definition. Is this your case also?
>>
>> Please file a bug report and let me know.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>>
>> Esteban Aliverti
>> - Developer @ http://www.plugtree.com
>> - Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com
>>
>>
>> 2011/3/21 Steven Williams <stevearoonie at gmail.com>
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I am trying to use a Knowledge Agent in 5.1.1 with a change set with a
>>> few different packages and resource types in it, and I am running into a
>>> problem where it is not adding all the packages. Looking at the code I can
>>> see that KnowledegeAgentImpl.createPackageFromResource has the following
>>> code when it loads a resource:
>>>
>>>             if (kbuilder.getKnowledgePackages().iterator().hasNext()) {
>>>
>>>                 return (KnowledgePackageImp)
>>> kbuilder.getKnowledgePackages().iterator().next();
>>>
>>>             }
>>>
>>>
>>> and KnowledgeBuilderImpl.getKnowledgePackages does the following:
>>>
>>>
>>> Package[] pkgs = pkgBuilder.getPackages();
>>>
>>> List<KnowledgePackage> list = new ArrayList<KnowledgePackage>(
>>> pkgs.length );
>>>
>>>
>>> and PackageBuilder.getPackages does the following:
>>>
>>>
>>>         for ( PackageRegistry pkgRegistry : this.pkgRegistryMap.values()
>>> ) {
>>>
>>>             Package pkg = pkgRegistry.getPackage();
>>>
>>>             // add package to array
>>>
>>>         }
>>>
>>>
>>> pkgRegistryMap is implemented as a HashMap however so the order the
>>> packages are returned in is not guaranteed. I seem to be hitting this
>>> problem.
>>>
>>> This is a hard one to create a unit test for so I wanted to check that my
>>> analysis is correct before raising a bug. Perhaps using a LinkedHashMap or
>>> similar would fix it?
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> Steve
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20110405/07c0d4a5/attachment.html