[rules-users] Memory issue with drools (using 10000 rules)

[Jevon Wright]

Would removing the eval() from your rule reduce memory usage?

Jevon

2011/4/26 Shebs, Liron <liron.shebs at hp.com>

> Hello All,
>
>
>
> I’m working at HP Software R&D and we are considering using drools in our
> product.
>
> Benchmarking tests showed that running 10,000 rules consumes 382mb.
>
> This is too high for our system requirements, and we would like to know how
> we can improve it.
>
> Technical details:
>
> -      Drools version: 5.1 with default configuration.
>
> -      All rules look like this:
>
>
>
> rule "status-Fixed-Open"
>
>                when
>
>                              event : FieldChangedEvent(fieldName ==
> "status", oldValue == "Fixed");
>
>                              entity : Entity(entityType == "mock-entity");
>
>                              eval(((String)
> entity.getFieldValue("status")).equals("Open"));
>
>                then
>
>                   do Something…
>
> end
>
>
>
> -      Loading code:
>
>
>
> KnowledgeBuilder knowledgeBuilder =
> KnowledgeBuilderFactory.newKnowledgeBuilder();
>
> for(all resources)
>
> {
>
> knowledgeBuilder.add(resource, ResourceType.DRL);
>
> }
>
> knowledgeBase = KnowledgeBaseFactory.newKnowledgeBase();
>
>
> knowledgeBase.addKnowledgePackages(knowledgeBuilder.getKnowledgePackages());
>
>
>
> Any insights are most appreciated.
>
>
>
> Thank You,
>
> Liron, HP Software R&D
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20110427/a2f6bf26/attachment.html