[rules-users] Backward chaining, again...
Mark Proctor
mproctor at codehaus.org
Sat Aug 13 04:15:22 EDT 2011
On 13/08/2011 07:21, johnysums wrote:
> Can you define "broken"? Would it work (at least enough for me to demonstrate
> an example to someone)?
If don't use the open query stuff, most things should be ok. But why not
use 5.3-beta1 we fixed most things in that?
http://blog.athico.com/2011/08/drools-530beta1-released-including.html
Mark
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Backward-chaining-again-tp3217917p3251050.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
More information about the rules-users
mailing list