[rules-users] Bulk modification
chocksmith
rodrigo.goncalves at coffeebeantech.com
Wed Aug 31 12:29:52 EDT 2011
:-)
Removed!
R.
On Aug 31, 2011, at 12:58 PM, Wolfgang Laun-2 [via Drools] wrote:
> Intuition can fail you, with Drools more than with many other systems I know...
>
> Basically, the exists preceding an accumulate is akin to
> if( list.size() > 0 )
> for( Elem el: list ){...}
>
> -W
>
> On 31 August 2011 16:58, chocksmith <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Humm... I do not have a benchmark. Thats only intuition... :-)
> If the fact does not exist, then all the rest of the LHS do not need to be
> tested/calculated. When I try to imagine how is the implementation of the
> "collect"... It sounds logical avoiding it if we know that it is not
> necessary.
>
> But I agree with you... It is redundant.
>
> Tx!
> R.
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-Bulk-modification-tp3297162p3298615.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-Bulk-modification-tp3297162p3298778.html
> To unsubscribe from [rules-users] Bulk modification, click here.
--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-Bulk-modification-tp3297162p3298867.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20110831/e2e0f76c/attachment.html
More information about the rules-users
mailing list