[rules-users] Problems with Domain Specific Language in eclipse

[ronalbury]

Personally - I would rather get an error when I make a mistake (e.g. do not
write the DSL correctly) than get get an error for writing perfectly valid
code.  Eclipse does support a DSL expansion window which allows you to find
issues like misspellings.  The current approach requires a total commitment
to DSL even if you want to use it under rare circumstances.

I did note your suggestion about prefixing with '>', but then my RHS looks
different in rule files where I use DSL than it does in files where I do not
use DSL (something I would rather avoid).


--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-Problems-with-Domain-Specific-Language-in-eclipse-tp3579963p3580113.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.