[rules-users] More temporal operator questions

Mike Melton mike.melton at gmail.com
Wed Dec 14 14:43:37 EST 2011


> Concerning #3: There is no need to avoid a logical disjunction of
> two constraints within a single pattern. It's only a disjunction of
> patterns that results in a rule split, which may cause surprising
> results.

Ah. That was a distinction I hadn't caught on to, though it's pretty
obvious to me now that I think about it. I will just go that route
then; it results in much more readable code.

Thanks.
Mike



More information about the rules-users mailing list