[rules-users] Drools 5 Memory Issues

Mark Proctor mproctor at codehaus.org
Wed Dec 28 16:57:47 EST 2011


On 28/12/2011 21:54, Mark Proctor wrote:
> On 28/12/2011 20:31, drools.user wrote:
>> Thanks for your reply.
>>
>> We are one month away from pushing our code into Production. So, I don't
>> think we will be able to move to 5.4 beta 1. Even though code change
>> involved might be minimal, it has to go through full testing cycle 
>> which is
>> very time consuming. Also, I don't think Management will put a beta 
>> release
>> into Production.
> give 5.3 a try.
>>
>> Is there any workaround to address those listeners issue in 5.2 
>> itself? What
>> exactly is the function of listeners and can we tweek our 
>> implementation to
>> limit the number of listener objects?
> lots came up on this for the mailing lists, search it.
>>
>> Also, what about the object size increase with Drools 5? Is that 
>> expected?
> we have no data to know either way. If people can show examples that 
> demonstrate different sizes across JVMs
sorry meant across different Drools versions.

Mark
>> -- 
>> View this message in context: 
>> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-5-Memory-Issues-tp3615095p3617252.html
>> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>




More information about the rules-users mailing list