[rules-users] drools problem

[Wolfgang Laun]

2011/2/2 saurabh maheshwari <maheshwari.saurabh03 at gmail.com>

> Hi ,
>
>           I am not sure about drools perfomance does it depends on no of
> rules or at no of objects .
>

On both. But a rule that's not well written will cause more harm when the
number of facts is increased.


>
>            When i am having 30000+ objects in the memory , i am facing the
> perfomance issues .
>
>            Can any one tell how i can increase the perfomance of my rule
> Engine in case where i 'll have to have large number of objects in memory .
>

Check your rules. If you cannot spot anything that's suspicious, you'll have
to experiment, subdividing your rule base and loading with timing.

-W


>
> Please inform if you have any idea about this.
>
>
>
> Thanks & Regards
>
> Saurabh
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20110202/538687d9/attachment.html