[rules-users] Dynamic Fact Types

[jwillans2]

Hi Thomas - Interesting idea.  I was trying to get to the point where the
classes weren't first class Java classes, but where the Java classes were
meta-classes for classes defined in data (if that makes sense).  On the
other hand given appropriate black-boxing, what you propose sounds
reasonable.

Thanks,

James

-- 
View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Dynamic-Fact-Types-tp2462037p2465695.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.