[rules-users] Drools in production use vs. JBoss BRMS commercially supported version?

[Benson Fung]

Normally, JBOSS BRMS is more stable.



On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:41 AM, dc tech <dctech1000 at gmail.com> wrote:

> I wonder if any, or perhaps many,  of you are using Drools community
> version in production systems? Or are you using the jBoss BRMS - the
> commercially supported version?
>
> If you are using the community version, what is your sense of
> stability of the releases?
>
> On 1/3/11, smogstate <smogstate at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > I have same issue. Can anyone help?
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Flow-within-Stateless-Session-in-Drools-5-1-tp2094451p2187624.html
> > Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
>
> --
> Sent from my mobile device
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>



-- 
Benson Fung
Solution Architect, Global Services, Greater China
| Redhat Hong Kong Limited || 45/F., The Lee Gardens, 33 Hysan Avenue,
Causeway Bay, Hong Kong || Office : 852-31802332 || Cell : 852-98369898 ||
benson.fung at redhat.com || http://www.hk.redhat.com||
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20110104/1a2c3d1a/attachment.html