[rules-users] Drools Java and .Net

[Michael Anstis]

There are implementations of JNI available too, that support the invocation
of Java code from .NET.

These bridges would (should) work but I have no experience of their use.

Google for "java .net jni" shows some options.

With kind regards,

Mike

2011/1/25 Diego López León <dieguitoll at gmail.com>

> Frank,
> you can try the IKVM project from Mono[0].
> >From their site:
> "Mono is able to run Java code side-by-side with .NET as well as
> having Java and .NET object interoperate with each other"
>
> Let us know if that worked.
>
> Regards.
>
> [0]:http://www.mono-project.com/Java
>
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:04 PM, FrankVhh
> <frank.vanhoenshoven at agserv.eu> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Suppose that you have a rule engine that needs to be embedded on the
> machine
> > and that there is no way to call the rules as a service from a
> centralized
> > server, what approach would one have to choose to make Drools and .NET
> work?
> >
> > The rulke engine will have to be cached to improve performance, so that
> > part, until there is an up-to-date version of Drools.NET, has to be in
> Java
> > anyway. Then you expose your JAVA code as a (local) service and let .NET
> > call it? Or am I seeing things wrong here?
> >
> > I must stipulate that I am not an expert in .NET at all, and I know only
> > barely enough Java to get Drools working :-).
> >
> > Thanks for your help.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Frank
> >
> >
> > salaboy wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes, and if you want to use the rule engine from .NET you can use the
> >> Drools
> >> Server that expose the Drools Runtime in REST and SOAP interfaces :)
> >> Greetings.
> >>
> >> 2011/1/19 Michael Anstis <michael.anstis at gmail.com>
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I believe the .NET implementation of Drools is somewhat out dated.
> >>>
> >>> However Drools ticks all your other requirements.
> >>>
> >>> With kind regards,
> >>>
> >>> Mike
> >>>
> >>> 2011/1/19 Gorantla, Bhaskar (GE Capital) <bhaskar.gorantla at ge.com>
> >>>
> >>>> We are looking for a rules engine that has the following
> >>>> characteristics.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> 1.       Supports both Java and .net
> >>>>
> >>>> 2.       Provides a business user friendly UI for creating/editing
> rules
> >>>>
> >>>> 3.       Supports versioning
> >>>>
> >>>> 4.       The rues in the rules repository are accessible to both Java
> >>>> and
> >>>> .net applications – Nice to have
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you know whether Drools supports all the above?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> rules-users mailing list
> >>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> rules-users mailing list
> >>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>  - CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com
> >>  - MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com
> >>  - Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar
> >>
> >>  - Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rules-users mailing list
> >> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Java-and-Net-tp2290536p2330462.html
> > Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
>
>
>
> --
> diego
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20110125/9e0f2065/attachment.html