[rules-users] Writing a pattern in which each event constraint depends on the previous event

[Wolfgang Laun]

On 30 January 2011 12:55, OlliSee <o.roess at seeburger.de> wrote:

>
> @Wolfgang: I guess you are referring to the list I use. Of course I expect
> them to be ordered by timestamp.
>


You sure do, but the question is whether you get them in this order during
processing by accumulate. There is no documentation that accumulate passes
through a set of selected facts in the order they were inserted. It could
just as well be the (random) order of some hash key, or reverse, or
whatever.

-W



> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Writing-a-pattern-in-which-each-event-constraint-depends-on-the-previous-event-tp2370165p2383235.html
> Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20110130/c41e4df0/attachment.html