[rules-users] Activation group and list of contained objects

Wishing Carebear wishing.carebear at gmail.com
Sat Jul 9 13:51:19 EDT 2011


Thanks,

Any pointers on how to implement these rules. May be using salience
and a Boolean status condition.



On Saturday, July 9, 2011, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun at gmail.com> wrote:
> The Expert manual:
>
> "Rules that belong to the same activation-group, identified by
>           this attribute's string value, will only fire exclusively. In other
>           words, the first rule in an activation-group to fire will cancel the
>           other rules' activations, i.e., stop them from firing."
>
> -W
>
> On 9 July 2011 18:13, Wishing Carebear <wishing.carebear at gmail.com> wrote:
> Let's say there is an employee with 4 address and all addresses should
> satisfies rule1.
>
> There are 4 rules with activation group of address. I see rule1 fired
> only once and not 4 times.
>
> Using Drools 5.2
>
> On Saturday, July 9, 2011, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> 2011/7/9 Wishing Carebear <wishing.carebear at gmail.com>
>>
>> Hi,
>> I have an employee object that contains list of Address.Activation group is defined on the Address rules. The Address list contains 4 address and 3 of them satisfies the Rule1. But all the rules are defined in the same activation group.
>>
>> Observe
>> Where?
>> -W
>>   that only one Address element executes the first rule. Is the expected bahvior of Activation group?
>>
>> Thanks for your time,
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>




More information about the rules-users mailing list