[rules-users] Should update be called moving from one rule task to another in a ruleflow

[Wishing Carebear]

Any pointers?

On Tuesday, July 12, 2011, Wishing Carebear <wishing.carebear at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> If I have a ruleflow with a sequence of rule tasks, should an update be called to reflect the state of the fact in the working memory? In another words If all the rules are mutually exclusive within a rule task, will the changes made in first rule task, if used as a condition in the next rule task will be reflected without calling explicit update.
>
> Thanks for your time and help.
>