[rules-users] Temporal reasoning with external persistence not working

[Wolfgang Laun]

First of all, don't use automated time stamping of events; add a field
carrying the (original) event time. I think you could also run the session
in CLOUD mode.

Also, it may not be advisable to pull in facts and reason over them in the
same rule. Perhaps retrieval and proper insertion of facts should even be
coded in Java, kept separate from the rule logic.

Much depends on the required use cases for running those multiple sessions,
and how canned events relate to other data.

-W


On 13 July 2011 02:13, rp2 <amanteja at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Wolfgang Laun-2 wrote:
> >
> > The example does not use events, as in @role(event). You can maintain
> > a value of type java.util.Date in your hibernated facts, but don't make
> > them events the way you do.
> >
> >
> It is important for me to use temporal reasoning and CEP, and hence HAD to
> define these as @events.
>
> In addition I wanted to load and persist these events from/in a custom non
> JPA compliant key-value store because I will be running multiple instances
> of drools as opposed to only one server. Therefore relying on  RAM based
> working memory is not enough.
>
> What would be your suggestion in that regard?
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Temporal-reasoning-with-external-persistence-not-working-tp3158399p3164267.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20110713/7be5f1b8/attachment.html