[rules-users] Should update be called moving from one rule task to another in a ruleflow

[Tihomir Surdilovic]

How about show your code and rules and maybe relevant parts of your 
process? Would help understand your situation better.  I would think 
creating a simple test case that covers your scenario would not take 
long to put together.

Thanks.
On 7/13/11 11:20 AM, Wishing Carebear wrote:
> Any pointers please!!
>
> On Tuesday, July 12, 2011, Wishing Carebear<wishing.carebear at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> Any pointers?
>>
>> On Tuesday, July 12, 2011, Wishing Carebear<wishing.carebear at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> If I have a ruleflow with a sequence of rule tasks, should an update be called to reflect the state of the fact in the working memory? In another words If all the rules are mutually exclusive within a rule task, will the changes made in first rule task, if used as a condition in the next rule task will be reflected without calling explicit update.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your time and help.
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>