[rules-users] [Drools4]: Filter executed rules by *.drl file

[Michael Anstis]

It was just a feeling, but Vincent's words from (presumably) experience
gives the individual rulebase option more credence.

On 20 July 2011 09:29, magendo <robert.heisenberg at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Thanks for your answers.
>
> The context fact thing would work, but it is really polluting the rules and
> makes a lot of unnecessary constraint checks. Furthermore the extends is
> not
> implemented in Drools 4 or I am blind (maybe it would be a good idea to
> switch to drools 5 anyway...).
>
> So I think I will go with the one drl per rulebase solution.
> @manstis: Could you explain why you think the control fact solution is
> better?
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools4-Filter-executed-rules-by-drl-file-tp3182568p3184864.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20110720/6517a807/attachment.html