[rules-users] Evals in 5.2

[Edson Tirelli]

   Inline evals should no longer be necessary, but backward compatibles
(i.e., the engine will just ignore them). There should be no change on
eval() CEs.

   It seems we still have a bug. I will investigate.

   Edson


2011/6/9 jkrupka <jkrupka at gmail.com>

> Should evals be supported in 5.2 with the same syntax that was used in 5.1?
> I commented on https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3055, but I'm
> wondering if this is a bug or just an undocumented change due to the parser
> work in 5.2...?
>
> I haven't tested to see what usage of evals break in 5.2 that worked in
> 5.1,
> I just know that I had multiple compile errors using 5.2.0CR1 on rules that
> worked in 5.1 (and even in 5.2.0M2) that had a standalone eval pattern.
>  The
> jira mentions the usage of && in the eval as the thing that causes it to
> break, but I haven't confirmed that.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Evals-in-5-2-tp3043452p3043452.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>



-- 
  Edson Tirelli
  JBoss Drools Core Development
  JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20110609/f100d5d1/attachment.html