[rules-users] Two drools that validate the same instance in one Guvnor package

[Serge Vilvovsky]

Thank you, Mike.

Can you let me know, please, what is the way to differentiate the
ruleflow-groups on Knowledge Base reading? What classes does it affect?

Regards,
Serge

2011/6/16 Michael Anstis <michael.anstis at gmail.com>

> IIRC, you can use different ruleflow-groups to differentiate the two rules.
>
> The problem you describe would be evident locally if you used a single
> KnowledgeBase containing the two rules. Creating two KBs would not normally
> be recommended.
>
> A single KB should be sufficient.
>
> With kind regards,
>
> Mike
>
> 2011/6/17 Serge Vilvovsky <sergevil at gmail.com>
>
>> I am a beginner with drools, sorry, if the question is too trivial.
>>
>> I have two drl files A and B. Both they validate the instance of the same
>> type T, but produce the different output.
>> I call the drool A within one business flow and drool B within another
>> flow.
>>
>> Before now I ran them locally, creating two separate KnowledgeBases, and
>> everything worked fine. Now I want to use the Guvnor.
>>
>> If I put them to the same package and run:
>>
>> http://<server>/guvnor-webapp/org.drools.guvnor.Guvnor/package/<packageName>/LATEST
>>
>> I will get the KnowledgeBase that contains them both, I believe. According
>> to my understanding, because they process the instance of the same type, I
>> cannot use such KnowledgeBase.
>>
>> What should I do? Is it any API that allows to distinguish the
>> KnowelageBases for the different drools within the same package or I need to
>> put them to the different packages?
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20110616/ce66f082/attachment.html