[rules-users] Extending type declaration

[jwillans2]

A fairly major blocker for some work I am doing is the ability to extend type
declarations:

declare B extends A
..
end

Such that the patterns take into account the polymorphism (which I think
they already do).  Is there any plans for this type of feature and/or is
there a way of intercepting the resulting Java definition arising from the
syntax in order to programmatically set this?

Thanks,

James

-- 
View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Extending-type-declaration-tp2601938p2601938.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.