[rules-users] FW: Basic rules question

[Abhay B. Chaware]

Wendy,

Thanks for helping me out so far.

I have another question. What if I have all my "RAM" objects inserted into working memory.   How should I write my rule's "when" portion to get a collection of all the RAM objects matching type "DDR" ?  In other words, can I get collection of facts assigned to a variable and use it in the "then" part ?

Thanks
Abhay

==================================
From: rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Wendy Mungovan
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 5:47 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Basic rules question


Q2:
  So the rule would be something like:

rule "RAM type"
  when
     $product: Product(type == "laptop");
 then
     //you are looking for the best way to set valid RAM types in the then part of the rule?
    $product.setRamType("DDR");
    //or
   $product.setValidRamOptions( getValidRamOptions("DDR"));
 end

where getValidRamOptions would be a custom function included through 'import function' so you can then load the choices from some where else.  Or if RamOptions were an object in memory you could have a rule like:

rule "RAM type"
  when
     $product: Product(type == "laptop");
     $ramOptions: RAMOptions(type == "DDR");

 then
   $product.setValidRamOptions( $ramOptions.getList());
 end




Wendy

==================================

Regards,

Abhay Chaware
Sr. Designer | KPIT Cummins Infosystems Ltd | Board: +91 020 6652 5000 | Extn: 2989  | abhay.chaware at kpitcummins.com |www.kpitcummins.com
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
________________________________
From: rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Wendy Mungovan
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 5:47 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Basic rules question

Abhay,
  Q1:  I think that this will depend on how many different products you have.  If there is a small number it is more straight forward to have a rule for each one (so the 2nd option).  This allows all you logic to be in one place.  If there are a large number of products and writing a rule for each one is intractable you probably would want to look into some generalizations of the rules.  Is that helpful?

  Q2: I'm not quite sure what you are getting at in Q2.  Are you trying to write validation rules or rules that are modifying the facts?

Wendy
________________________________
From: Abhay B. Chaware <Abhay.Chaware at kpitcummins.com>
To: "rules-users at lists.jboss.org" <rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Fri, May 6, 2011 4:59:46 AM
Subject: [rules-users] Basic rules question
Hi

I am a newbie to rule based applications and trying to get the concept of rules. I have couple of questions about rules to start with, not specifically about Drools though.

Q1 - Should rules be data/model specific or can/should they be generic or both
==========================================================
e.g.
If selected product "TYPE" is "laptop", then category "RAM" should have all "DDR" type items compatible ( selecting items matching certain property )
OR
If selected product is "IBM T42", then category "RAM" should have "512MB DDR" , "1024MB DDR", "2048MB DDR"  compatible. ( assigning individual items in rules )
OR
Combination of both


Q2 - How should be the data modeled in above case
==========================================================
e.g.
in product master, each item ( e.g. T40, T42 ) should have a "TYPE" ( e.g. desktop or laptop ) , all items in category "RAM" should have a "TYPE" ( e.g. DDR ) and then control the assignment of RAM options to the PRODUCT through Rule using "DDR" type ?
OR
in product master, each item ( e.g. T40, T42 ) should have a "TYPE" ( e.g. desktop or laptop ) , all items in category "RAM"  should have a "compatibleProduct" column ( e.g. desktop or laptop ) and control the assignment of RAM to PRODUCT through "dynamic" rules by selecting all the RAMs by passing the "TYPE" of the product to the database handler.

Am I making my point clear ?

Thanks
Abhay

This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the KPIT Cummins Infosystems Ltd. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. KPIT Cummins Infosystems Ltd. does not accept any liability for virus infected mails.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20110509/699b7788/attachment.html