[rules-users] Rules Portability

[Mark Proctor]

On 26/05/2011 10:10, Marco Piraccini wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I'm wondering about the use of drools with "portable" rules definition.
> The fact is that the Drools rules definition is not portable (true?).
> But the "knowledge", of course, should be portable.
> For instance it should be great to have SWRL support (I see that
> there's a very old mailing list thread about that, but not so useful),
> or at least some tools to translate DRL to SWRL.
>
> Anyone has some idea/experience about that topic?
You can be portable if you do a small subset, drools supports features 
beyond things like SWRL or SPARQL.

Mark
> Marco.
>