[rules-users] Accessing globals after FireAllRules

[Wolfgang Laun]

Although not an expert on Flow, I can say that there can hardly be anything
fundamentally wrong with this brief Flow, where a simpler solution might be
equally possible. Much depends on other circumstances, e.g., possible future
developments, deployment, workload,...

-W


On 27 May 2011 14:18, sdinoo <sdinoo at gmail.com> wrote:

> Awesome! This worked
> Thank you very much Wolfgang!!
>
> Though, I have a architectural question
> My use case is in "claims processing" and here are the steps that need to
> happen
> 1) Recieve patients claim (prescription claim, like medicines)
> 2) Retrieve the patients Claim History (use patient ID in claim)
> 3) Retrieve the drug information (use RxID in claim)
> 4) Subject the claim to the rules in drools
> 5) Respond with rule results (show the contributing claims that caused the
> rules to fire)
>
> for this ,
> I created a Rule flow
> Step 2) and 3) are rule tasks that ONLY fetch information
> Step 4) I want to write the rules (mix of java helper classes and drl) and
> subject the claim to that
> Step 5) return the results (via the List option that you just gave me)
>
> Is this the way people use the Rule Flow?
> Do you see anyting fundamentally wrong here?
> Do you think I should you Stateless sessions instead of rule flow?
>
> Do let me know
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Accessing-globals-after-FireAllRules-tp2989144p2992639.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20110527/8b1806dd/attachment.html