[rules-users] Preventing re-evaluation on modification of 'output' fact

[Robert Crawford]

Have you considered making the reasons for being suspicious objects in their
own right and inserting them independently? Let's say:

SuspectedFraudReason (abstract parent class)
TransactionsTooOften (extends SuspectedFraudReason)
TransactionsTooHigh (extends SuspectedFraudReason)

then indicate the reasons by inserting a new instance of an object, rather
than modifying your results object. If you have rules that depend on other
indicators of fraud, then they only get evaluated when that particular class
of SuspectedFraudReason is inserted, rather than every time you modify the
results object.

At the end, you can use a query() to collect all the reasons.



--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Preventing-re-evaluation-on-modification-of-output-fact-tp3455022p3472137.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.