[rules-users] Drools 5.3 DSL and DRL

[FrankVhh]

Hi,

I am not entirely sure about 5.3, but you certainly could escape pure DRL
phrases during DSL and DSLR parsing in V5.1. It would surprise me if they
threw that out.

You could escape a DRL line by using 'greater than' >

Regards,
Frank
 

gboro54 wrote
> 
> That is what I thought... I was hoping we would be able to write a rule
> using a combination of our DSL and rule syntax
> 


--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-5-3-DSL-and-DRL-tp3524786p3525135.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.