[rules-users] 5.3.0 CR1 has broken existing rules/flows

[Wolfgang Laun]

I have found that any serious Drools application should write and deploy a
consequence exception handler of its own. Perhaps you look at my modest
effort<http://members.inode.at/w.laun/drools/CustomConsequenceExceptionHandlingHowTo.html>-
I think it is still compatible. Any feedback welcome ;-)
-W

On 4 October 2011 04:46, lhorton <LHorton at abclegal.com> wrote:

> This is very good info.  I have found those Drools ConsequenceExceptions a
> real PITA to troubleshoot.  I wonder if the exception could be enhanced to
> show this info so users don't have to debug it?  I mean, to have the
> exception message show the true culprit rule name, or something useful like
> that?
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-3-0-CR1-has-broken-existing-rules-flows-tp3390922p3392014.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20111004/eb187401/attachment.html