[rules-users] Possible "memory leak" in 5.3 with update?

[Mark Proctor]

On 04/04/2012 11:53, thenim wrote:
> I have to hang my head in shame, it seems that the issue is not related to
> the engine, but a linked blocking queue that I was using to use to
> communicate with another thread. My hypothesis is that with the "update"
> approach, the first thread is going too fast and the second thread simply
> cannot keep up, where as with the insert approach, the first thread is
> slowed down enough to allow the second thread to keep up.
But I'd just spent 4 hours debugging your problem?

Mark
>
> The heapdump analysis showed that it was only the queue that was keeping the
> references.
>
> I will delete this post.
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Possible-memory-leak-in-5-3-with-update-tp3874271p3883745.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users