[rules-users] Guvnor guided editor and non argument constructor

[Sean Su]

Any time frame for the final release? I played with CR1 and it does not
seem stable.

Sent from my iPad

On Apr 26, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis at gmail.com>
wrote:

Yes, if you use 5.4 - this supports BRL fragments as columns. Rule
Templates also support DSLs.

HOWEVER - and this is probably an issue - DSLs in Guvnor currently only
support literal values.

So if you use a DSL in either a Decision Table or Rule Template you cannot
specify different values in the table for the DSL place-holder.

On 26 April 2012 19:21, Sean Su <sean.x.su at gmail.com> wrote:

> Can DSL be presented as the decision table as well? Any examples if yes?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Sean
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Apr 26, 2012, at 1:14 PM, Vincent LEGENDRE <
> vincent.legendre at eurodecision.com> wrote:
>
> Should use a DSL then.
>
> ------------------------------
> *De: *"Sean Su" <sean.x.su at gmail.com>
> *À: *"Rules Users List" <rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> *Envoyé: *Jeudi 26 Avril 2012 19:06:57
> *Objet: *Re: [rules-users] Guvnor guided editor and non argument
> constructor
>
> What I am prototyping is part of the event processing (with or without
> fusion). I want to use the rules created by the Guvnor to create the new
> events. However, as you would understand, once the event has been created,
> it should not be modified as it happened in the past.
>
> So I am trying to avoid setters if possible.
>
> Sean
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Apr 26, 2012, at 12:49 PM, Vincent LEGENDRE <
> vincent.legendre at eurodecision.com> wrote:
>
> JavaBeans convention : all default constructible and plenty of setters
> (for writeable properties) and getters (for readeable properties)
>
> ------------------------------
> *De: *"Michael Anstis" <michael.anstis at gmail.com>
> *À: *"Rules Users List" <rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> *Envoyé: *Jeudi 26 Avril 2012 15:40:27
> *Objet: *Re: [rules-users] Guvnor guided editor and non argument
> constructor
>
> Seems reasonable enough.
>
> On 26 April 2012 14:36, Sean Su <sean.x.su at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It seems that the new fact created by the guided editor must be from
>> the java class that has the default non argument constructor in
>> Guvnor. There seems no way we can customize it to pass arguments in.
>> This would force us to provide setters to the object.
>>
>> Is this a true statement?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Sean
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20120426/ca797267/attachment.html