[rules-users] [rules-user] problem with private members (no getters)

[Wolfgang Laun]

A multi-level switch? Long or short action sequences for each innermost
branch?

On 10 February 2012 12:17, ehmkey <ehmkey at gmail.com> wrote:

> I have a big switch case construction and i want to replace that with a
> rule
> based system.
>
> In the switch case are functions and they have parameters. Some of this
> parameters are private.
> The only idea i had was that i can create methods and call the methods with
> the rules.
>
> e.g the key of the switch-case is private, and i dont need and wont a
> getter
> for this
>
> greetings Markus
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-user-problem-with-private-members-no-getters-tp3732106p3732190.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20120210/584a431a/attachment.html