[rules-users] Multiple threading

[Mark Proctor]

On 10/02/2012 03:36, Apache wrote:
> Hey,
> I am trying to get multiple threads to insert events and run rules against the union of events inserted ( an as soon as they are inserted, a timer drools thread kicking of fireallrules() is not an option because that would introduce a delay ) and wanted some opinion on the following:
>
> 1. Stateless session is basically a wrapper around statefulsession and since per doc  statefulsession is not threadsafe is it  safe to assume 2 threads cannot insert and run fireallrules to compare against a union of objects inserted by multiple threads without some synchronication on event insertion and ESP fireallrulesrules ? ( would the answer still hold despite a drools-camel endpoint reading and storing exchanges from multiple threads ? )
stateful sessions are thread safe, they just aren't multi-threaded. Each 
of the working memory actions hold a lock, so only one thread at a time 
can enter.
>
> 2. If in the above point we simplify the case where the rule uses the "from" keyword and reads from a cache or a Db ( is reading from
> A cache supported out of the box ? ) then will drools bhaviour will be bound by the thread which invokes fireallrules() ?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20120210/7e7848bf/attachment.html