[rules-users] Using an OWL Ontology in drools - advice

Salaboy salaboy at gmail.com
Sat Feb 18 06:47:24 EST 2012


You can watch davide's github user and follow him

- CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com
- MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar
- Mauricio "Salaboy" Salatino -

On 18/02/2012, at 06:21, Anton Hughes <kurrent93 at gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> Hi Anton,
> I'm (un)officially in charge of the topic. Right now I have identified the
> following topics/tasks, feel free to ask for more details on any one of
> them:
> 
> 1) Use the ontology to create a fact model to write rules with : I'm
> perfecting the tool even now, in a few days the alpha version will be
> available for testing.
> It's meant to be pretty flexible, support many persistency techniques,
> provide convenience methods and will be integrated with the recent
> "traiting" (dynamic typing) technique.
> It makes some (reasonable) assumptions on the ontology, and would need use
> cases and consolidations.
> 
> 1b) Once the fact model is there, we'd have to instantiate the individuals
> in the ontology as facts
> 1c) We have a side project to make this compatible with guvnor, to edit
> "semantically constrained" rules.
> 
> 2) Use the definitions in the ontology to create classification rules. Would
> be "rule-style", in close world assumptions. My feeling is that it would
> create an execution framework for a SPIN-like language (or, if you prefer, a
> DRL version of the SPIN framework).
> I haven't started it yet, but could be done in a relatively few days
> 
> 3) Use the definitions in the ontology to create a rule-based,
> object-oriented semantic reasoner. A proof of concept for a fuzzy semantic
> reasoner exists, but that definitely is on the TODO list. Help, as always,
> is appreciated :)
> This would be a necessary complement to the fact model, to ensure it's kept
> consistent with the ontology.
> 
> 
> Hi Davide
> 
> Thanks, the work youre doing sounds really exciting and promising!
> 
> I would very much like to follow your progress, and, if I can, help out. 
> 
> What is the best way to follow the progress of  this project?
> 
> Kind regards,
> Anton
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20120218/20c0363c/attachment.html 


More information about the rules-users mailing list