[rules-users] Anyone know any reason not to replace mvel2-drools4 with mvel2-beta6 jars in Drools 5.3.0.Final?

[ge0ffrey]

ndipiazza wrote
> 
> Related to posts: 
> 
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-5-2-performance-building-KnowledgeBase-tc3239746.html#a3284343
> 
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/time-loading-rules-into-knowledgebase-giving-different-results-when-using-mvel2-beta6-versus-mvel2-ds-tc3733481.html
> 
> In Drools 5.3.0.Final, I noticed that when loading rules package, there
> seems to be a big time and memory gain between mvel2-beta6 jar versus
> mvel2-drools4 jars.
> 
> Has anyone seen or know of any problems with using the mvel2-beta6 jars
> that we might encounter?
> 

The mvel 2.1 beta's are actually older then most of the mvel 2.1 drools
releases. Check nexus timestamps.
The versions are indeed not maven/osgi conflict resolution compatible (they
are not alfabatically comparable ordered), but as long as mvel doesn't
release 2.1.0.Final there's little we can do.

--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Anyone-know-any-reason-not-to-replace-mvel2-drools4-with-mvel2-beta6-jars-in-Drools-5-3-0-Final-tp3803795p3812544.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.