[rules-users] Can I capture the result of an RMI call within a pattern?

[lhorton]

That would be a good approach for one location.  My real world rules are 24
rules for 24 different locations.  If I used your approach, I think I would
have to look up and insert all 24 locations for each session execution (we
use stateless sessions) in order to have the 24 setter rules work.  

I am trying to avoid too many calls to the RMI service (remote database
reads), which is why I was trying to put all the work into the one rule
pattern.  in my real-world rules, there are more conditions in the pattern
than just the RMI lookup, so that only one of the setter rules will fire for
each session execution.



--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Can-I-capture-the-result-of-an-RMI-call-within-a-pattern-tp3848873p3849422.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.