[rules-users] Drools 5.3 Salience

[gboro54]

That is what I figured ...just wanted a second opinion. 


Mark Proctor wrote
> 
> On 02/05/2012 18:09, gboro54 wrote:
>> I know using salience is not the best way to order rules but some of our
>> rules do have a higher priority then others. Since we are writing the
>> rules
>> using a DSL I have created set set of Priority levels which set the
>> salience. One of these levels set salience to 0(default value). Is there
>> any
>> harm in putting this on every rule with no priority for consistence when
>> reading the rules.
> There is no performance impact from this. All rules have a salience 
> value, whether you assign it or not, it just defaults to 0.
> 
> Mark
>>
>> TIA
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-5-3-Salience-tp3955545.html
>> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at .jboss
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at .jboss
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> 


--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-5-3-Salience-tp3955545p3956857.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.