[rules-users] Drools time to insert facts

Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.laun at gmail.com
Tue Aug 6 07:37:39 EDT 2013


Hm, but the insight that
  when A()  A() then
with n facts of class A generates n*n activations is rather basic. OP
was running a series of tests with a rule whose LHS is set to A()A(),
A()A()A(), A()A()A()A() up to 6 times, with exponentially increasing
execution time.

-W



On 06/08/2013, rjr201 <rich.j.riley at gmail.com> wrote:
> hey,
>
> Sorry I'm limited as to what I can download on this machine so will have to
> look at your code later. Unless you just want to copy and paste it here..
>
> Wolfgang - I don't think he is trying to "show" anything. Reading his post
> it seems more like he wants someone to give him an insight into why it's
> behaving the way it is.
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-Drools-time-to-insert-facts-tp4025343p4025369.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>


More information about the rules-users mailing list