[rules-users] DSL Bug?

[Stephen Masters]

Exactly. Guvnor is a little bit lenient as it is able to look at the DSL itself rather than just the DSRL.

I use DSL to support rules being written in the guided editor too. But I tend to find it's still worth creating a JUnit test which loads the DSL and a test DSRL file containing a rule for each pattern in your DSL. The rules don't need to do much, but it ensures that your DSL is generating valid DRL.

Steve


On 11 Feb 2013, at 16:45, rjr201 <rich.j.riley at gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes, that's a good point. I guess the confusion arises in the way the guided
> editor creates two separate input boxes, one for the fact_name and one for
> the fact_label. I didn't think about the DSRL that the Guided Editor is
> (presumably) using behind the scenes. I guess the DSRL has no concept of the
> input boxes the user used to input the values. It just takes them and
> inserts them blindly into the DSRL. 
> 
> Thanks for your help. 
> 
> Rich. 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/DSL-Bug-tp4022209p4022217.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users