[rules-users] Evaluate rules for multiple facts of the same type within a StateuflSession

[pdario]

@ part was just for your remark on cumbersomeness...

I'm now reading the linked whitepaper.

It's not easy for me to see how your example is easier than mine solution.

I acknowledge salience redistribution would be a problem, that's why I kept
them separated and kept salience values meaningful only within each
activation-group.

At the moment, anyway, the activation-group is stopping me from evaluating
rules for a bunch of facts in only one run, so I have to find a different
solution (supposing that a multiple single fact activation is not efficient,
something I'm not sure).

I'll read the whitepaper and see if agenda-group would better fit in my
case.

Thank you all. :-)



--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Evaluate-rules-for-multiple-facts-of-the-same-type-within-a-StateuflSession-tp4022157p4022276.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.