[rules-users] Easy mistake... - drools operator precedence

[Wolfgang Laun]

On 18/02/2013, Geoffrey De Smet <ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think so too.
> It looks like the : operator has a higher precedence then + (and
> therefor >= too), which is a bit surprising indeed.
> Personally, I never mix the : operator with other operators, to avoid
> having to worry about the precendence.

Is it possible to use a non-boolean expression as a constraint?

-W