[rules-users] Guvnor 5.5 being WIERD

[Michael Anstis]

I think we are talking about 2 different problems that have become
intertwined.

1) Given the example Rule, and assuming the LHS is matched a Dummy fact
should be inserted into WM, and the OP is stating the command to retrieve
this new Dummy fact is not working as it did with 5.2.

2) Guvnor's Editor is not allowing fields on an existing Dummy fact to be
updated. This, I believe, is because of the lack of a LHS binding in the
example rule.

Starfish, can you clarify what the actual problem you are experiencing is?

On 17 January 2013 11:02, Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti at gmail.com>wrote:

> Maybe a screenshot of Guvnor's editor might help.
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>
> Esteban Aliverti
> - Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:01 PM, starfish15 <pooja.ghosh at accenture.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> Manstis,
>>
>> If you notice the code written to execute the rules, you will find the
>> Dummy
>> object being added. That inserts the fact in the working memory of the
>> rules
>> i beleive. And hence it shud have been available in the Condition Facts
>> also
>> when i tried to add that. My Model.jar has all the three Facts in them.
>> However, i always got only class, class1. Dummy was never received.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Starfish
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Guvnor-5-5-being-WIERD-tp4021569p4021603.html
>> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20130117/85c0c67b/attachment.html