[rules-users] Drools rule [Planner]
André Fróes
arfmoraes at gmail.com
Wed Jan 30 10:23:09 EST 2013
Would be this:
[image: Imagem inline 2]
i noticed 2 thing doing this test, 1st, the ID binded on workorder/engineer
can be the same, for example, it will run if I have an workorder id 0 and
an engineer id 0, and that it will run if provided time enough to do the
comparison by the xml file, otherwise, it will present a result full of
"null's".
I generate the workorder/engineer this way:
--------
List<Engineer> engineerList = new ArrayList<Engineer>();
for (int i = 1; i < 1001; i++){
engineerList.add(new Engineer(i, "engineer " + i, 8 ));
}
List<WorkOrder> workOrderList = new ArrayList<WorkOrder>();
for (int i = 1002; i < 3002; i++){
workOrderList.add(new WorkOrder(i, (new Random().nextInt(5-1+1)+1)));
}
----------------
in order to stop receiving nulls, i increased the termination from 5s to
120s, and it worked
----------------
<termination>
<maximumSecondsSpend>120</maximumSecondsSpend>
</termination>
----------------
2013/1/30 Geoffrey De Smet <ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com>
> Now try 2000 workorders and 1000 engineers and see what it does ;-)
>
> Op 30-01-13 14:27, André Fróes schreef:
>
> Just to knowledge, i'm sending the graph of memory usage when running it
> with, first marker(between first 2 green lines) peak with 10 workorders and
> 5 engineers, and, secong marker (between last 2 green lines), 26 workordes
> and 10 engineers.
> [image: Imagem inline 1]
>
>
> 2013/1/30 Geoffrey De Smet <ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com>
>
>> I wonder why it worked on the 5.5.0.Final with the cloudbalance but not
>> with my workorder example that was much simpler,
>>
>> Me too. All the examples / unit tests work with 5.5.0.Final, but there's
>> clearly a case they don't cover.
>> Good thing is that 5.6 will be out soon.
>>
>> Op 30-01-13 13:30, André Fróes schreef:
>>
>>
>> It worked with the 5.5.1-SNAPSHOT
>>
>> -----------------
>> 10:27:49.215 [main] INFO o.d.p.core.solver.DefaultSolver - Solving
>> started: time spend (179), score (null), new best score (null), random seed
>> (0).
>> 10:27:49.254 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.c.g.DefaultGreedyFitSolverPhase -
>> Step index (0), time spend (224), score (0hard/0soft), initialized planning
>> entity ([WorkOrder-15]).
>> 10:27:49.256 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.c.g.DefaultGreedyFitSolverPhase -
>> Step index (1), time spend (225), score (0hard/0soft), initialized planning
>> entity ([WorkOrder-14]).
>> 10:27:49.284 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.c.g.DefaultGreedyFitSolverPhase -
>> Step index (2), time spend (254), score (0hard/0soft), initialized planning
>> entity ([WorkOrder-13]).
>> 10:27:49.293 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.c.g.DefaultGreedyFitSolverPhase -
>> Step index (3), time spend (263), score (0hard/0soft), initialized planning
>> entity ([WorkOrder-12]).
>> 10:27:49.297 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.c.g.DefaultGreedyFitSolverPhase -
>> Step index (4), time spend (267), score (0hard/0soft), initialized planning
>> entity ([WorkOrder-11]).
>> 10:27:49.300 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.c.g.DefaultGreedyFitSolverPhase -
>> Step index (5), time spend (270), score (0hard/0soft), initialized planning
>> entity ([WorkOrder-10]).
>> 10:27:49.306 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.c.g.DefaultGreedyFitSolverPhase -
>> Step index (6), time spend (276), score (0hard/0soft), initialized planning
>> entity ([WorkOrder-9]).
>> 10:27:49.310 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.c.g.DefaultGreedyFitSolverPhase -
>> Step index (7), time spend (280), score (0hard/0soft), initialized planning
>> entity ([WorkOrder-8]).
>> 10:27:49.315 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.c.g.DefaultGreedyFitSolverPhase -
>> Step index (8), time spend (285), score (0hard/0soft), initialized planning
>> entity ([WorkOrder-7]).
>> 10:27:49.321 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.c.g.DefaultGreedyFitSolverPhase -
>> Step index (9), time spend (291), score (0hard/0soft), initialized planning
>> entity ([WorkOrder-6]).
>> 10:27:49.321 [main] INFO o.d.p.c.c.g.DefaultGreedyFitSolverPhase - Phase
>> constructionHeuristic ended: step total (10), time spend (291), best score
>> (0hard/0soft).
>> 10:27:50.041 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.l.DefaultLocalSearchSolverPhase -
>> Step index (0), time spend (1010), score (0hard/0soft), best score
>> (0hard/0soft), accepted/selected move count (1000/1000) for picked step
>> ([WorkOrder-8] <=> [WorkOrder-12]).
>> 10:27:50.744 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.l.DefaultLocalSearchSolverPhase -
>> Step index (1), time spend (1714), score (0hard/0soft), best score
>> (0hard/0soft), accepted/selected move count (1000/1422) for picked step
>> ([WorkOrder-14] <=> [WorkOrder-10]).
>> 10:27:51.568 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.l.DefaultLocalSearchSolverPhase -
>> Step index (2), time spend (2538), score (0hard/0soft), best score
>> (0hard/0soft), accepted/selected move count (1000/2013) for picked step
>> ([WorkOrder-6] <=> [WorkOrder-9]).
>> 10:27:52.083 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.l.DefaultLocalSearchSolverPhase -
>> Step index (3), time spend (3053), score (0hard/0soft), best score
>> (0hard/0soft), accepted/selected move count (1000/3635) for picked step
>> ([WorkOrder-11] <=> [WorkOrder-15]).
>> 10:27:52.902 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.l.DefaultLocalSearchSolverPhase -
>> Step index (4), time spend (3872), score (0hard/0soft), best score
>> (0hard/0soft), accepted/selected move count (1000/8864) for picked step
>> ([WorkOrder-7] <=> [WorkOrder-13]).
>> 10:27:54.030 [main] DEBUG o.d.p.c.l.DefaultLocalSearchSolverPhase -
>> Step index (5), time spend (5000), score (0hard/0soft), best score
>> (0hard/0soft), accepted/selected move count (0/31698) for picked step
>> ([WorkOrder-15] <=> [WorkOrder-7]).
>> 10:27:54.031 [main] INFO o.d.p.c.l.DefaultLocalSearchSolverPhase - Phase
>> localSearch ended: step total (6), time spend (5001), best score
>> (0hard/0soft).
>> 10:27:54.031 [main] INFO o.d.p.core.solver.DefaultSolver - Solving
>> ended: time spend (5001), best score (0hard/0soft), average calculate count
>> per second (9730).
>>
>> Solved distribution with 10 work orders and 5 engineers:
>> 6: ID: 5 - Monkey D. Ruffy
>> 7: ID: 5 - Monkey D. Ruffy
>> 8: ID: 4 - Mr. Miyagi
>> 9: ID: 4 - Mr. Miyagi
>> 10: ID: 3 - Rambo
>> 11: ID: 3 - Rambo
>> 12: ID: 2 - Chuck Norris
>> 13: ID: 2 - Chuck Norris
>> 14: ID: 1 - Aladin
>> 15: ID: 1 - Aladin
>> ---------------
>>
>> I wonder why it worked on the 5.5.0.Final with the cloudbalance but not
>> with my workorder example that was much simpler, i mean, the rule was only
>> a hard constraint and the pojo simples though.
>>
>>
>> 2013/1/29 André Fróes <arfmoraes at gmail.com>
>>
>>> Okay I'll try it now and then post the result.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing listrules-users at lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing listrules-users at lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20130130/f2f2788b/attachment-0001.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 29836 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20130130/f2f2788b/attachment-0002.png
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 24669 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20130130/f2f2788b/attachment-0003.png
More information about the rules-users
mailing list