[rules-users] Cannot invoke method because of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
Mario Fusco
mario.fusco at gmail.com
Thu Mar 7 11:24:33 EST 2013
Wolfgang,
first of all let me reenforce one of the advices you already gave: never
rely on overloading of functions. Always try to use different names for
different functions. This will be even more true in Drools 6 especially if
we will decide to take in the functional programming features I suggested a
few months ago.
Said that, at the moment I am not sure where the problem could be. I fixed
a few varargs related issues on mvel and I hoped it was ok now, but there
is still the possibility that Bojan found an edge case.
Bojan, btw which version of Drools (and mvel) are you using? Of course I
need to reproduce this issue to have a clue about what it is going wrong. I
will try to do that on my own, but if you could send a self contained
project reproducing this bug it could save me lots of time, make me sure
that I am working on the "right" problem and allow me to focus on its
resolution.
Cheers,
Mario
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun at gmail.com>wrote:
> The problem is not the loop in isEqualMore. I think the problem is caused
> by MVEL not handling the signature (Ann...) correctly.
>
> @Mario: should MVEL be able to deal with such a function call?
>
> -W
>
>
> On 07/03/2013, Bojan Janisch <bojan.janisch at scai.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> > I've tested all 4 cases. It is strange that each Rule fired exactly one
> > time,
> > directly before the exception occurs. Here the rules, I've built them
> > exactly
> > for this problem.
> > ============================================
> > Test 1(isEqualMore):
> > rule "Test Experiment 1"
> > no-loop
> > when
> > $a1:ODMAnswer()
> >
> > $a2:ODMAnswer(
> > !isEqual($a1,$a2),
> > comesAfter($a1,$a2,50))
> >
> > $a3:ODMAnswer(
> > comesAfter($a2,$a3,20),
> > !isEqualMore($a1,$a2,$a3))
> > then
> > System.out.println("Test 1 works");
> > end
> >
> > Result:
> > Same Runtime exception
> > ============================================
> > Test 2(isEqualThree):
> > rule "Test Experiment 2"
> > no-loop
> > when
> > $a1:ODMAnswer()
> >
> > $a2:ODMAnswer(
> > !isEqual($a1,$a2),
> > comesAfter($a1,$a2,50))
> >
> > $a3:ODMAnswer(
> > comesAfter($a2,$a3,20),
> > !isEqualThree($a1,$a2,$a3))
> > then
> > System.out.println("Test 2 works");
> > end
> > Result:
> > Works perfect without errors.
> > ============================================
> > Test 3(isEqualMore):
> > rule "Test Experiment 3"
> > no-loop
> > when
> > $a1:ODMAnswer()
> >
> > $a2:ODMAnswer(
> > !isEqual($a1,$a2),
> > comesAfter($a1,$a2,5))
> >
> > ($a3:ODMAnswer(
> > comesAfter($a2,$a3,5)) and
> > eval(!isEqualMore($a1,$a2,$a3)))
> > then
> > System.out.println("Test 3 works");
> > end
> > Result:
> > Works also without errors (I'm surprised).
> > ============================================
> > Test 4(isEqualThree):
> > rule "Test Experiment 4"
> > no-loop
> > when
> > $a1:ODMAnswer()
> >
> > $a2:ODMAnswer(
> > !isEqual($a1,$a2),
> > comesAfter($a1,$a2,5))
> >
> > ($a3:ODMAnswer(
> > comesAfter($a2,$a3,5)) and
> > eval(!isEqualThree($a1,$a2,$a3)))
> > then
> > System.out.println("Test 4 works");
> > end
> > Result:
> > Works perfect, but seems to get more matches
> > than the 3. experiment.
> > ============================================
> > Fazit:
> >
> > In my eyes there seems to be a problem using a loop in a constraint.
> > Even if I use different names (see Test 2), I'm still getting the
> > runtime exception. As bonus test-case I've tried using Test 3 and
> > overloading the function, rather than using a different function name,
> > but this also failed.
> >
> > Seems that I have to use eval() and different names if I want to compare
> > multiple named entities, though I still don't know why. Maybe the isEqual
> > call in the loop is calling itself and generating an out of bounds
> exception
> > at the last array entity.
> >
> > Thank you wolfgang.
> >
> > JB
> > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> > Von: "Wolfgang Laun" <wolfgang.laun at gmail.com>
> > An: "Rules Users List" <rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. März 2013 13:36:12
> > Betreff: Re: [rules-users] Cannot invoke method because
> > of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
> >
> > You have lost me - I'm not sure anymore what works and what doesn't.
> >
> > Please check or rewrite, using the names
> > isEqualMore(Annotation... annos)
> > isEqualThree(Annotation a1, Annotation a2, Annotation a3)
> >
> > 1) not $a5:ODMAnswer(..., ! isEqualX($a3,$a4,$a5) )
> > does not work for X==More and
> > does not work for X==Three
> >
> > 2) not( $a5:ODMAnswer(...) and eval( ! isEqualX($a3,$a4,$a5) )
> > works for X==More and
> > works for X==Three
> >
> > -W
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 07/03/2013, Bojan Janisch <bojan.janisch at scai.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> >>> Experiment 1
> >>> Please write isEqualThree for 3 Annotation arguments and use this,
> >>> just to make sure that these Problems are caused by Drools. (Do NOT
> >>> rely on overloading, use another name.)
> >>
> >> I've created an isEqualThree function
> >>
> >> public static boolean isEqualThree(Annotation a, Annotation b,
> Annotation
> >> c){
> >> if(isEqual(a,b) || isEqual(b,c) || isEqual(a,c)){
> >> return true;
> >> }
> >> return false;
> >> }
> >>
> >> By the way, it works also with overloading, I've never had problems with
> >> overloading in Drools. And I've tested also with different names, the
> >> problem
> >> remains, even using different function names.
> >>
> >>> Experiment 2
> >>> Using the isEqual as it is now, rewrite the last pattern as:
> >>>
> >>> not ( $a5:ODMAnswer(
> >>> isInAnnotation($a1,$a5),
> >>> isBigger($a3,$a5) )
> >>> and
> >>> eval( ! isEqual($a3,$a4,$a5) )
> >>> )
> >>
> >> Your condition works without problems using the isEqualThree function,
> it
> >> works
> >> also if I overload the function. It also works if I put the isEqual
> >> condition out
> >> of the eval, into the object constraints. But if I want to use my
> primary
> >> idea, using
> >> different names,
> >>
> >> public static boolean isEqualMore(Annotation... a)
> >>
> >> I still get the same error from the isEqualMore function.
> >>
> >> java.lang.RuntimeException: cannot invoke method: isEqualMore
> >> at
> >>
> de.fraunhofer.scai.bio.uima.core.deploy.StatusCallbackListenerImpl.entityProcessComplete(StatusCallbackListenerImpl.java:151)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.uima.collection.impl.cpm.engine.CPMThreadGroup.notifyListener(CPMThreadGroup.java:103)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.uima.collection.impl.cpm.engine.CPMThreadGroup.uncaughtException(CPMThreadGroup.java:86)
> >> at java.lang.Thread.dispatchUncaughtException(Thread.java:1888)
> >> Caused by: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 3
> >> at
> >>
> org.mvel2.optimizers.impl.refl.nodes.MethodAccessor.executeAll(MethodAccessor.java:149)
> >> at
> >>
> org.mvel2.optimizers.impl.refl.nodes.MethodAccessor.getValue(MethodAccessor.java:48)
> >> at
> org.mvel2.ast.ASTNode.getReducedValueAccelerated(ASTNode.java:108)
> >> at
> >>
> org.mvel2.compiler.ExecutableAccessor.getValue(ExecutableAccessor.java:38)
> >> at
> org.mvel2.ast.Negation.getReducedValueAccelerated(Negation.java:48)
> >> at org.mvel2.MVELRuntime.execute(MVELRuntime.java:85)
> >> at
> >>
> org.mvel2.compiler.CompiledExpression.getValue(CompiledExpression.java:123)
> >> at
> >>
> org.mvel2.compiler.CompiledExpression.getValue(CompiledExpression.java:116)
> >> at org.mvel2.MVEL.executeExpression(MVEL.java:930)
> >> at
> >>
> org.drools.rule.constraint.MvelConditionEvaluator.evaluate(MvelConditionEvaluator.java:70)
> >> at
> >>
> org.drools.rule.constraint.MvelConditionEvaluator.ensureBranchEvaluation(MvelConditionEvaluator.java:113)
> >> at
> >>
> org.drools.rule.constraint.MvelConditionEvaluator.ensureCompleteEvaluation(MvelConditionEvaluator.java:106)
> >> at
> >>
> org.drools.rule.constraint.MvelConditionEvaluator.ensureCompleteEvaluation(MvelConditionEvaluator.java:90)
> >> at
> >>
> org.drools.rule.constraint.MvelConditionEvaluator.getAnalyzedCondition(MvelConditionEvaluator.java:82)
> >> at
> >>
> org.drools.rule.constraint.MvelConstraint.executeJitting(MvelConstraint.java:214)
> >> at
> >>
> org.drools.rule.constraint.MvelConstraint.access$000(MvelConstraint.java:41)
> >> at
> >> org.drools.rule.constraint.MvelConstraint$1.run(MvelConstraint.java:201)
> >> at
> >>
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1146)
> >> at
> >>
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
> >> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
> >>
> >> JB
> >>
> >> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> >> Von: "Wolfgang Laun" <wolfgang.laun at gmail.com>
> >> An: "Rules Users List" <rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> >> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. März 2013 06:46:29
> >> Betreff: Re: [rules-users] Cannot invoke method because
> >> of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
> >>
> >> On 06/03/2013, Bojan Janisch <bojan.janisch at scai.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> >>> But that's exactly what java is doing if you say the Arguments are
> >>> method(X... xs).
> >>> Java is then generating an array of the type you set and you can work
> >>> with
> >>> xs like an
> >>> normal array.
> >>
> >> Yes, Java, but.
> >>
> >>> By the way, seems I get this Error
> >>>
> >>> Unable to Analyse Expression isEqual(new Annotation[]{$a3,$a4,$a5})
> >>> [Error: could not instantiate class]
> >>> [Near : {... isEqual(new Annotation[]{$a3,$a4,$a5}) ....}]
> >>> ^
> >>> [Line: 129, Column: 8]
> >>
> >> Suspicious, may have to raise a JIRA.
> >>
> >> Experiment 1
> >> Please write isEqualThree for 3 Annotation arguments and use this,
> >> just to make sure that these Problems are caused by Drools. (Do NOT
> >> rely on overloading, use another name.)
> >>
> >> Experiment 2
> >> Using the isEqual as it is now, rewrite the last pattern as:
> >>
> >> not ( $a5:ODMAnswer(
> >> isInAnnotation($a1,$a5),
> >> isBigger($a3,$a5) )
> >> and
> >> eval( ! isEqual($a3,$a4,$a5) )
> >> )
> >>
> >>
> >> -W
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The changed method is:
> >>>
> >>> public static boolean isEqual(Annotation[] a){
> >>> ArrayList<Annotation> outLoop = new
> >>> ArrayList<Annotation>(Arrays.asList(a));
> >>> ArrayList<Annotation> inLoop = new
> >>> ArrayList<Annotation>(Arrays.asList(a));
> >>>
> >>> for (Annotation anno1 : outLoop) {
> >>> inLoop.remove(anno1);
> >>> for (Annotation anno2 : inLoop) {
> >>> if(isEqual(anno1,anno2)){
> >>> return true;
> >>> }
> >>> }
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> return false;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> >>> Von: "Wolfgang Laun" <wolfgang.laun at gmail.com>
> >>> An: "Rules Users List" <rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> >>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. März 2013 17:11:43
> >>> Betreff: Re: [rules-users] Cannot invoke method because
> >>> of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
> >>>
> >>> I wouldn't use (X... xs) in this context.
> >>>
> >>> Try the simple modification of isEqual( Annotation[] annos ) and
> >>> call it with isEqual( new Annotation[]{$a3,$a4,$a5})
> >>> and we'll see what we'll see.
> >>>
> >>> -W
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 06/03/2013, Bojan Janisch <bojan.janisch at scai.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> >>>> Like you wish wolfgang. The complete Rule is:
> >>>>
> >>>> rule "Generate Finding_ConceptId"
> >>>> no-loop
> >>>> when
> >>>> $a1:ODMAnswer(
> >>>> q1:QuestionId,
> >>>> q1.toLowerCase.contains("diagnose") ||
> >>>> q1.toLowerCase.contains("indication"),
> >>>> q1.toLowerCase.contains("sections"),
> >>>> a1_begin:begin,
> >>>> label1:ResponseAttribute)
> >>>>
> >>>> $a2:ODMAnswer(
> >>>> ResponseAttribute.contains(label1),
> >>>> QuestionId.contains("sectionheader"),
> >>>> comesBefore($a1,$a2));
> >>>>
> >>>> $a3:ODMAnswer(
> >>>> q3:QuestionId,
> >>>> !q3.contains("finding.conceptId"),
> >>>> !q3.contains("itemGroup"),
> >>>> !q3.contains("section"),
> >>>> a3_begin:begin,
> >>>> a3_end:end,
> >>>> label2:ResponseAttribute,
> >>>> isInAnnotation($a1,$a3))
> >>>>
> >>>> $a4:ODMAnswer(
> >>>> q4:QuestionId.contains("finding.conceptId"),
> >>>> a4_begin:begin,
> >>>> comesAfter($a2,$a4),
> >>>> isBetween($a2,$a3,$a4),
> >>>> isInAnnotation($a1,$a4))
> >>>>
> >>>> not $a5:ODMAnswer(
> >>>> isInAnnotation($a1,$a5),
> >>>> isBigger($a3,$a5),
> >>>> !isEqual($a3,$a4,$a5))
> >>>> then
> >>>> String questionId = "finding.conceptId";
> >>>> String attribute = label1 +" "+ label2;
> >>>> int begin = a4_begin;
> >>>> int ende = a3_end;
> >>>> boolean addToIndexes = true;
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> insert(annotate(aJCas, questionId, attribute, begin, ende,
> >>>> addToIndexes));
> >>>> end
> >>>>
> >>>> The functions are in a seperate FactChecker class, because the
> >>>> "incode-comparison"
> >>>> was too much of a chaos. So I wrote functions which explains
> themselves
> >>>> what
> >>>> they do:
> >>>> ==================================================================
> >>>> public static boolean isInAnnotation(Annotation a, Annotation b){
> >>>> if(isNull(a,b)){
> >>>> return false;
> >>>> }
> >>>> if(b.getBegin() > a.getBegin() && b.getEnd() < a.getEnd()){
> >>>> return true;
> >>>> }
> >>>> if(a.getBegin() > b.getBegin() && a.getEnd() < b.getEnd()){
> >>>> return true;
> >>>> }
> >>>> return false;
> >>>> }
> >>>> ==================================================================
> >>>> public static boolean isInAnnotation(Annotation... a){
> >>>> for (int i = 0; i < a.length; i++){
> >>>> if(i+1 == a.length){
> >>>> return false;
> >>>> }
> >>>> if(isInAnnotation(a[i], a[i+1])){
> >>>> return true;
> >>>> }
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> return false;
> >>>> }
> >>>> ==================================================================
> >>>> public static boolean comesBefore(Annotation a, Annotation b){
> >>>> if(isNull(a,b)){
> >>>> return false;
> >>>> }
> >>>> if(b.getEnd() <= a.getBegin()){
> >>>> return true;
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> return false;
> >>>> }
> >>>> ==================================================================
> >>>> public static boolean comesAfter(Annotation a, Annotation b){
> >>>> if(isNull(a,b)){
> >>>> return false;
> >>>> }
> >>>> if(a.getEnd() <= b.getBegin()){
> >>>> return true;
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> return false;
> >>>> }
> >>>> ==================================================================
> >>>> public static boolean isEqual(Annotation a, Annotation b){
> >>>> if(isNull(a,b)){
> >>>> return false;
> >>>> }
> >>>> if(a.equals(b)){
> >>>> return true;
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> return false;
> >>>> }
> >>>> ==================================================================
> >>>> public static boolean isEqual(Annotation... a){
> >>>> ArrayList<Annotation> outLoop = new
> >>>> ArrayList<Annotation>(Arrays.asList(a));
> >>>> ArrayList<Annotation> inLoop = new
> >>>> ArrayList<Annotation>(Arrays.asList(a));
> >>>>
> >>>> for (Annotation anno1 : outLoop) {
> >>>> if(anno1 == null){
> >>>>
> >>>> }
> >>>> inLoop.remove(anno1);
> >>>> for (Annotation anno2 : inLoop) {
> >>>> if(isEqual(anno1,anno2)){
> >>>> return true;
> >>>> }
> >>>> }
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> return false;
> >>>> }
> >>>> ==================================================================
> >>>> public static boolean isNull(Annotation... a){
> >>>> for (Annotation annotation : a) {
> >>>> if(annotation == null){
> >>>> return true;
> >>>> }
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> return false;
> >>>> }
> >>>> ==================================================================
> >>>> public static boolean isBigger(Annotation a, Annotation b){
> >>>> if(isNull(a,b)){
> >>>> return false;
> >>>> }
> >>>> if(a.getBegin() == b.getBegin() && a.getEnd() < b.getEnd()){
> >>>> return true;
> >>>> }
> >>>> if(b.getBegin() < a.getBegin() && a.getEnd() == b.getEnd()){
> >>>> return true;
> >>>> }
> >>>> if(b.getBegin() < a.getBegin() && a.getEnd() < b.getEnd()){
> >>>> return true;
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> return false;
> >>>> }
> >>>> ==================================================================
> >>>> public static boolean isBetween(Annotation a, Annotation b, Annotation
> >>>> c){
> >>>> if(isNull(a,b,c)){
> >>>> return false;
> >>>> }
> >>>> Annotation min = getMin(a,b);
> >>>> Annotation max = getMax(a,b);
> >>>>
> >>>> if(isOverlapping(a,c) || isOverlapping(b,c)){
> >>>> return true;
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> if(c.getBegin() > min.getEnd() && c.getEnd() < max.getBegin()){
> >>>> return true;
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> return false;
> >>>> }
> >>>> ==================================================================
> >>>> public static Annotation getMax(Annotation a, Annotation b){
> >>>> isNull(a,b);
> >>>> if(a.getBegin() >= b.getBegin()){
> >>>> return a;
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> return b;
> >>>> }
> >>>> ==================================================================
> >>>> public static Annotation getMin(Annotation a, Annotation b){
> >>>> isNull(a,b);
> >>>> if(a.getEnd() <= b.getEnd()){
> >>>> return a;
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> return b;
> >>>> }
> >>>> ==================================================================
> >>>>
> >>>> I've posted all functions that are used by the rule. Actually it
> crushes
> >>>> if I use more than 2 statements in the isEqual() call in $a5.
> >>>> It works with !isEqual($a3,$a4) && !isEqual($a3,$a5) &&
> >>>> !isEqual($a4,$a5)
> >>>> but not with !isEqual($a3,$a4,$a5).
> >>>>
> >>>> So do you got an idea where the problem comes from?
> >>>>
> >>>> JB
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> >>>> Von: "Wolfgang Laun" <wolfgang.laun at gmail.com>
> >>>> An: "Rules Users List" <rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> >>>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. März 2013 15:09:47
> >>>> Betreff: Re: [rules-users] Cannot invoke method because
> >>>> of ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
> >>>>
> >>>> Nice try - but, please, don't. Kindly post the code that actually
> >>>> causes your problem.
> >>>>
> >>>> -W
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 06/03/2013, Bojan Janisch <bojan.janisch at scai.fraunhofer.de>
> wrote:
> >>>>> Hello Guys,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> sorry to bother you with this problem, but I'm out of ideas.
> >>>>> I'm using Drools in textmining-context and in basic I have
> >>>>> a function that checks 2 named entites for equality to
> >>>>> ensure that the entities are all different and that the rules
> >>>>> do work only on different named entity objects:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> public static boolean isEqual(Annotation a, Annotation b){
> >>>>> if(a.equals(b)){
> >>>>> return true;
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> return false;
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sometimes there are conditions that need tests of more than
> >>>>> 2 named entites. For this I've written a super method that
> >>>>> calls the isEqual method in a loop:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> public static boolean isEqual(Annotation... a){
> >>>>> ArrayList<Annotation> outLoop = new
> >>>>> ArrayList<Annotation>(Arrays.asList(a));
> >>>>> ArrayList<Annotation> inLoop = new
> >>>>> ArrayList<Annotation>(Arrays.asList(a));
> >>>>>
> >>>>> for (Annotation anno1 : outLoop) {
> >>>>> inLoop.remove(anno1);
> >>>>> for (Annotation anno2 : inLoop) {
> >>>>> if(isEqual(anno1,anno2)){
> >>>>> return true;
> >>>>> }
> >>>>> }
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> return false;
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> My rules could (theoretically) now call the function
> >>>>> eval(isEqual($ne1,$ne2)) or
> >>>>> eval(isEqual($ne1,$ne2,$ne3) or even
> >>>>> eval(isEqual($ne1,$ne2,$ne3,$ne4,$ne5)) and so on.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So there starts my problem:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Each time I'm getting an ArrayIndexOutOfBounds Exception from the
> >>>>> second
> >>>>> method that looks like this:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> java.lang.RuntimeException: cannot invoke method: isEqual
> >>>>> ...
> >>>>> at java.lang.Thread.dispatchUncaughtException(Thread.java:1888)
> >>>>> Caused by: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 3
> >>>>> at
> >>>>>
> org.mvel2.optimizers.impl.refl.nodes.MethodAccessor.executeAll(MethodAccessor.java:149)
> >>>>> at
> >>>>>
> org.mvel2.optimizers.impl.refl.nodes.MethodAccessor.getValue(MethodAccessor.java:48)
> >>>>> at
> org.mvel2.ast.ASTNode.getReducedValueAccelerated(ASTNode.java:108)
> >>>>> at
> >>>>>
> org.mvel2.compiler.ExecutableAccessor.getValue(ExecutableAccessor.java:38)
> >>>>> ...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Could someone explain me what's wrong with my code? Thanks for any
> >>>>> help.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Greetings
> >>>>> JB
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> rules-users mailing list
> >>>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >>>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> rules-users mailing list
> >>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> rules-users mailing list
> >>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> rules-users mailing list
> >>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> rules-users mailing list
> >>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rules-users mailing list
> >> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rules-users mailing list
> >> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20130307/964ad19a/attachment-0001.html
More information about the rules-users
mailing list