[rules-users] Ignore subsequent conditions in a Decision Table based on previous condition
Michael Anstis
michael.anstis at gmail.com
Tue Mar 12 06:06:56 EDT 2013
If a CONDITION (or ACTION for that matter) is not to apply for a given rule
you should be able to simply leave the cell empty.
CONDITION CONDITION CONDITION ACTION
Y
result1
N N Y result2
N N N result3
N Y N result4
N Y Y result5
On 12 March 2013 10:03, ciberg2 <joaoguerra72 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, I'm new to Drools and I'm implementing rules using Excel decision
> tables
> and I need some of your help.
>
> I have some rules in which depending on a condition the following condition
> is not necessary, how can I define a table that akllows to define this?
>
> For instance I have:
> CONDITION CONDITION CONDITION ACTION
> Y
> result1
> N N Y
> result2
> N N N
> result3
> N Y N
> result4
> N Y Y
> result5
>
> In the example above (I hope you can see it right) if the first condition
> value is Y the other 2 conditions values don't matter and despite their
> value the result will always be the same.
> I wouldn't want to have to write all the possible combinations as these in
> the real case will add a lot of complexity to the tables.
>
> How can I accomplish this? Is it possible to do it in Excel? If not, how
> can
> I do it in another way (for instantance with guvnor web-based tables).
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Ignore-subsequent-conditions-in-a-Decision-Table-based-on-previous-condition-tp4022778.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20130312/33f6fc8a/attachment-0001.html
More information about the rules-users
mailing list