[rules-users] Drools Guvnor - Testing rules

[Davide Sottara]

Thanks for reporting, the ConditionalBranchDescr should be
managed by verifier. I'll create a JIRA for this and make sure
it's included in 5.6.



On 05/02/2013 11:51 AM, rswanson wrote:
> Using 5.5.0.Final, I just started trying to use the verifier and get a number
> of these exceptions:
>
> org.drools.verifier.visitor.UnknownDescriptionException: Descr ( class
> org.drools.lang.descr.ConditionalBranchDescr ) is unknown to drools
> verifier.
> 	at
> org.drools.verifier.visitor.RuleDescrVisitor.visit(RuleDescrVisitor.java:109)
> 	at
> org.drools.verifier.visitor.ConditionalElementDescrVisitor.visit(ConditionalElementDescrVisitor.java:46)
> 	at
> org.drools.verifier.visitor.RuleDescrVisitor.visitAndDescr(RuleDescrVisitor.java:233)
> 	at
> org.drools.verifier.visitor.RuleDescrVisitor.visitRuleDescr(RuleDescrVisitor.java:80)
> 	at
> org.drools.verifier.visitor.PackageDescrVisitor.visitRuleDescr(PackageDescrVisitor.java:118)
> 	at
> org.drools.verifier.visitor.PackageDescrVisitor.visitRules(PackageDescrVisitor.java:111)
> 	at
> org.drools.verifier.visitor.PackageDescrVisitor.visitPackageDescr(PackageDescrVisitor.java:63)
> 	at
> org.drools.verifier.builder.VerifierImpl.addPackageDescr(VerifierImpl.java:90)
> 	at
> org.drools.verifier.builder.VerifierImpl.addResourcesToVerify(VerifierImpl.java:230)
>
> I'm guessing these are being caused by my use of the new 'Conditional named
> consequences' feature.  Any idea if this will be supported in the upcoming
> 5.6 release?
>
> Thanks,
> Roger
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Guvnor-Testing-rules-tp4023594p4023638.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>