[rules-users] How does drools provides an explanation of how the solution was arrived?

Esteban Aliverti esteban.aliverti at gmail.com
Fri Oct 4 04:49:23 EDT 2013


Let me add that you can also use a custom AgendaEventListener to keep track
of all the rules that were executed.

Regards,


XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Esteban Aliverti
- Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com


On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 10:20 AM, rjr201 <rich.j.riley at gmail.com> wrote:

> This is a statement about the nature of rules engines in general. Rules
> engines are made up of human readable rules, as opposed to say a neural
> network where the knowledge isn't explicitly represented (it's a big black
> box of maths). A rules engine is symbolic, a neural network sub-symbolic. A
> neural network can give you an answer, but not a justification of why.
> People like rules engines because (when done properly) they can see why it
> has given the answer it has given.
>
> To answer your question, to get a explanation of what the rules engine did,
> you could insert a logging object as a global into your rules session and
> then add a log statement in the conclusion of each rule.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-does-drools-provides-an-explanation-of-how-the-solution-was-arrived-tp4026253p4026263.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20131004/6136e963/attachment.html 


More information about the rules-users mailing list