[rules-users] why define the returnedProcessor twice

scarlettxu xu_han_zi at 163.com
Thu Oct 17 06:04:40 EDT 2013


Hi,

Sorry I have not checked the source code.
I just download the binaries from http://download.jboss.org/drools/release

I decompile the class to check it.
maybe something wrong with the decompiler?

I should check the source file, sorry for the trouble!




--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/why-define-the-returnedProcessor-twice-tp4026406p4026409.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


More information about the rules-users mailing list