[rules-users] Random rule fire

[Wolfgang Laun]

Second thoughts: it might be easier to add code to the right hand side to
achieve this random firing.


On 3 April 2014 09:04, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun at gmail.com> wrote:

> You can insert a fact containing the random number and add a pattern with
> the constraint. Where is the problem?
>
>
> On 2 April 2014 23:45, vvicky72 <vvicky72 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> We have a unique situation. Using guided decision tables, we want a
>> particular rule to fire randomly even when all the conditions on the
>> "when"
>> clause are satisfied.
>>
>> So...
>> We want to assign a positive integer to every rule (say n). We want that
>> rule to fire only when
>> "new Random().nextInt(n)+1 = n" is true (along with other conditions in
>> the
>> rule)
>>
>> Any suggestions?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vikas.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Random-rule-fire-tp4029103.html
>> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20140403/a01c9075/attachment.html