[rules-users] Identical Facts over rules, results being cached?

[Esteban Aliverti]

The question here is: what is the result of fireAllRules()? Caching the
result of this method is trivial: it's just a number! I think that what you
need to build is your own ad-hoc cache that knows how to extract a 'result'
out of the session an keep it handy. Implementing this mechanism shouldn't
be that hard (at least for simple - no nested- Facts) and once you have it
you can validate the benefits.

Regards,


XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Esteban Aliverti
- Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com


On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Leonard93 <leonardlindenau at hotmail.com>wrote:

> Wouldn't that depend on how long the data is being kept and how often
> identical rules are being fired?
>
> Or would you say the rule engine is faster than all the actions in between
> that it wouldnt matter?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Identical-Facts-over-rules-results-being-cached-tp4029169p4029172.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20140409/0ea9c9c8/attachment.html