[rules-users] "Cannot find KieModule" with kieServices.newKieContainer() with LATEST or RELEASE instead of explicit version number (eg: 0.0.1)

[Matteo Mortari]

Hello Mark, yes, kie-ci is on the class path, is the only dependency
declared in the project pom, so this gets resolved inside the .jar at
package time.

I've tested suggestion from Mario which will follow in separate email.

Thanks for your feedback anyway
Ciao,
MM



On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:

> Just want to check that you have kie-ci on the class path? As this is
> necessary to resolve meta versions using maven. Otherwise only explicit
> versions will work, on the local m2 cache only.
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> On 31 Jan 2014, at 10:00, Matteo Mortari <matteo.mortari at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Mark,
> For reference, I've attached to the original Jira DROOLS-419 zip file with
> source code and detailed instruction how to replicate issue, and how to
> replicate workaround as well. That is the simple code I've used to
> replicate the issue on Windows box and Linux box before submitting the jira
> bug entry.
>
> Concerning your question to provide unit test, I have to admit I'm a bit
> lost how could this be achieved ?
> As this is more of an integration aspect than code, if I was to write a
> JUnit for this, it would require to 1 empty .m2 local repo directory, 2
> provide an "embedded nexus" (not sure if actually feasible) and 3 perform
> maven commands from shell, not by direct use of the API. 4 do the kie api
> call to trigger the stack trace.
>
> So, can I kindly know if zip file and instructions with Jira DROOLS-419
> are sufficient, or I shall investigate further if and how to self-contain
> all of this in a JUnit test, please?
>
> Thank you for your feedback
> MM
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 1:44 AM, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org>wrote:
>
>> Can you create a unit test that reproduces your issue. Something that
>> follows this:
>>
>> https://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools/blob/master/kie-ci/src/test/java/org/kie/scanner/KieRepositoryScannerTest.java
>>
>>
>> http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/5.6.0.Final/droolsjbpm-introduction-docs/html/gettingstarted.html
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>> On 30 Jan 2014, at 19:49, Matteo Mortari <matteo.mortari at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>> in the hope this could save time if someone has been experiencing same
>> issue. Drools 6.0.1.Final
>>
>> I had message "Cannot find KieModule" with kieServices.newKieContainer()
>> with LATEST or RELEASE , instead of explicit version number (eg: 0.0.1) on
>> a application where the KIE module Rule artifact project kjar has been
>> locally-installed from remote Maven repository, that is the right hand side
>> of this diagram:
>> http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/6.0.1.Final/drools-docs/html_single/#d0e933
>>
>> Meaning that before launching Application, I performed
>> mvn org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-dependency-plugin:2.8:get
>> -Dartifact=com.acme:X:LATEST -DrepoUrl=
>> http://nexus-hostname/nexus/content/repositories/releases/
>>
>> Then:
>> kieServices.newKieContainer() with LATEST,
>> kieServices.newKieContainer() with RELEASE,
>>
>> failed with stack trace:
>> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: Cannot find
>> KieModule: com.acme:X:RELEASE
>>         at
>> org.drools.compiler.kie.builder.impl.KieServicesImpl.newKieContainer(KieServicesImpl.java:86)
>>         at (...)
>>
>> But kieServices.newKieContainer() with a fixed version, eg.: 0.0.2 did
>> indeed worked OK, if installed in the local .m2 repository.
>>
>> To avoid this issue, I found only 3 possible workarounds
>> 1 use mvn maven-dependency-plugin:go-offline but did not work all of the
>> time
>> 2 manually ensure maven-metadata-local.xml file is generate in local .m2
>> repository
>> 3 just download manually .jar and .pom of the remote maven repo, and then
>> install with mvn install:install-file
>>
>> In this case, of workaround kieServices.newKieContainer()  works OK with
>> all the version LATEST, RELEASE, and fixed version number.
>>
>> Raise jira DROOLS-419 with more details and example projects, please
>> don't hate me if was just me missing something or not-Drools issue actually
>> =P
>> In my defense I had good intentions saving somebody's else time in case
>> same strange behavior, which is really strange because to me it worked only
>> with explicit fixed version number, and that was really bizarre ;)
>>
>> Hope this helps,
>> Ciao
>> MM
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20140203/d5ecce5a/attachment.html